Central Europe Review find out about advertising in CER
Vol 3, No 13
2 April 2001
 CER INFO 
front page 
overview 
our awards 
CER cited 
subscribe 
advertising 
classifieds 
submissions 
jobs at CER 
internships 
CER Direct 
e-mail us 
 ARCHIVES 
year 2000 
year 1999 
interviews 
by subject 
by author 
EU Focus 
kinoeye 
books 
press 
news 
search 
 MORE 
ebookstore 
pbookshop 
music shop 
video store 
find books 
conferences 
FreeMail 
papers 
Crowns 
links 

 

Hot spotsIs this
Déjà Vu?

Montenegro's path
to independence

Omer Fisher

The recent history of Yugoslavia and, in general, of countries in transition in Eastern Europe, seems to tell us that being a republic of a "socialist federation" is a necessary and, perhaps, sufficient condition for secession. All 15 former Soviet republics are now independent states; the Czech Republic and Slovakia have separated; Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia-Hercegovina and Macedonia are no longer constituent parts of the Yugoslav Federation. So far, the exception has been Montenegro, which has remained, with Serbia, one of the two federal sub-units of "rump Yugoslavia." What will happen next? Will Montenegro remain the "exception that proves the rule" or opt for independence?

More than resemblance

Montenegro's president, Milo Đukanović, who proposes an EU-style loose confederation for Serbia and Montenegro, has officially called for parliamentary elections in the Republic, elections which will take place in April and are expected to be followed by a referendum on independence. Recent polls show that a majority of the Montenegrin population is now in favour of independence and that a "Montenegrin Bloc" coalition, composed of those parties advocating independence, could obtain a two-thirds majority in the next elections.

Javier Solana, the EU high representative for foreign and security policy, recently warned Đukanović against "unilateral steps," he stressed, however, that the European Union would not break off relations with the Montenegrin leadership over the issue of independence. Some readers might think they have already seen all this. And, in fact, recent events in Montenegro strongly remind one of how other republics, in Yugoslavia and elsewhere, have ventured onto the path of independence.

Power of the elite

Looking more carefully at what has been going on in Yugoslavia recently, one can find more reasons, other than a superficial resemblance with the past, to believe that Montenegro will eventually secede. The local Montenegrin leadership in the past few years has been able to mobilise considerable (although not overwhelming) support, both using the issues of Montenegrin sovereignty/independence and advocating democratic reforms against Milošević's regime.

In this way, the local political elite gained the support of the international community and transformed Montenegro in a de facto independent entity. The institutional context in which this has happened is provided by the 1992 Yugoslav Constitution. This basic law, in many respects, is in the same tradition of old socialist federal constitutions: it defines an unviable and chaotic federal system. This means that, in the absence of any sufficiently strong central power, what is the federation and what is the relationship between federal units is constantly a matter of negotiation between different sectors of the elite.

The institutional context, in other words increases the incentive for the Montenegrin leadership, to play the "anti-centre" card. Playing this card when Milošević was still in power meant advocating democratic reforms and demanding more powers for the Montenegrin periphery; today, now that a more democratically oriented leadership has replaced the old regime in Belgrade, the issue of independence is at the top of Đukanović's agenda.

Peaceful separation?

What might obstruct Montenegro's path to independence? A few facts have to be taken into account. First of all, the problem of a Montenegrin national identity. Although public opinion polls suggest that independence is today supported by a majority of the Montenegrin population, this remains far from a large majority.

Attempts to construct a separate Montenegrin national identity have not been completely successful and, for many Montenegrins, it would be very difficult to see Serb as the "other." In addition, the results of the forthcoming elections will be crucial in determining the future status of the Republic, and in the (not very likely?) case that "Yugoslavist" parties manage to form a coalition and to win the elections, any referendum on independence will be unlikely to take place.

Another factor that needs to be considered is the international context. In the past, the international community has paid lip service to the preservation of borders and national unity while, in some cases, actively supporting centrifugal forces. Today, things may be a little different. In Belgrade, Milošević has been substituted by Koštunica and the West, strongly involved in the Balkans, is committed to helping him in this delicate transition phase. This means that nobody really wants Koštunica to be weakened by Montenegro's drive towards independence.

Making predictions is difficult (and making predictions in the Balkans is almost impossible). I have just pointed out some facts, such as the institutional context and the structure of incentives affecting the choices of the Montenegrin
Send this article to a friend
leadership, which seem to indicate that Montenegro will attempt to separate from Serbia. On one hand, the imminent elections will be of crucial importance, as the electorate will vote bearing in mind that the outcome of the elections may determine whether or not Montenegro will remain part of Yugoslavia. On the other hand, the fact in itself that the Montenegrin national identity is still rather weak should not necessarily be a significant obstacle to independence.

Recent history has shown how, without strong national feeling, ethnic mobilisation and even significant popular support for independence, countries can break down and peripheries can secede. It is still early to determine what the role of international factors will be. However, particularly with a peaceful separation process, it nevertheless seems doubtful that any figure in the international community will be able to muster a threat credible enough to influence the decisions of the Montenegrin voters and leadership.

Omer Fisher, 2 April 2001

Moving on:

 

THIS WEEK:
Wojtek Kość
The Polish Right

The Balkans Heat Up
Heather Field
Going for Broke

Magarditsch Hatschikjan
Crisis to Crisis

Omer Fisher
The Road to Independence

Sam Vaknin
Balkan War III

Roma Culture
in Hungary

Dan Damon
Liszt and the Roma

Rhoda Dullea
The Roma Question

Gusztáv Kosztolányi
Romani Theater

Behind Bars!
Susan Abbott
Slobo's Support

Brian J Požun
Slovenia's Opportunity

Sam Vaknin
A Prelude to Death?

Catherine Lovatt
"We will never
give you up!"

Books:
Stanisław Lem

Peter Swirski
Look to the Future

Stanisław Lem
An excerpt from Okamgnienie

eBooks:
Štěpán Kotrba
Sow and Reap

Brian J Požun
Shedding the Balkan Skin

Martin D Brown
Czech Historical Amnesia

Dejan Anastasijević (ed)
Out of Time

Gusztáv Kosztolányi
Hungarian Oil Scandal

Sam Vaknin
After the Rain

Press Reviews:
Oliver Craske
Big in Albania

News:
Albania
Bosnia
Bulgaria
Croatia
Czech Republic
Estonia
EU/NATO
Hungary
Kosovo
Latvia
Lithuania
Macedonia
Romania
Serbia
Slovakia
Slovenia

CER eBookclub Members enter here